📊 Published every week

Backtests

Four records, one per indicator per market. Every week we publish what each indicator actually showed, and what price did next, including the calls that went wrong and the sessions it declined to call at all.

Nothing on these pages was in the sample. Each set of tables was measured on history ending before the first week reviewed, so every session published here is out of sample by construction. That is the whole point of writing the record in public rather than showing a curated backtest.

How these are scored

  • TranscribedEvery figure on every weekly page is read off the capture of that window or session. Nothing is recomputed afterwards, and the scoring scripts refuse to run if a set of shares does not add up.
  • Out of sampleEach indicator's tables were frozen on history ending before the first published week. No session reviewed was available to the tables when they were built.
  • Abstains countBoth indicators decline to call some sessions. Those are published too, with what happened afterwards, because an abstain that would have been right is as much a part of the record as a call that was.
  • Not a track recordNo entries, exits, position sizing or costs are modelled anywhere. These pages show what the indicator displayed and what price did, not what a trade would have returned.
  • Red folder daysHigh-impact USD releases are marked against the day they fall on, so a week's result can be read with the calendar rather than against it.
A week is not evidence. Ten windows or five sessions cannot confirm a frequency measured over hundreds of thousands, and any single week can flatter or bury a perfectly well-behaved statistic. These records exist so the sample accumulates somewhere you can check it, including the weeks that go badly.